Not every UK limited company needs a statutory audit. Many smaller companies qualify for audit exemption, but it is important to understand the rules, as an audit may still be required in certain situations.

For financial years starting on or after 6 April 2025, a company is generally audit exempt if it qualifies as a small company and meets at least two of the following conditions:

If a company exceeds these limits, it will not usually lose audit exemption straight away. In most cases, the company must exceed the thresholds for two consecutive financial years before the exemption is lost.

However, some companies must have an audit regardless of size. This includes public companies and certain regulated businesses, such as banks, insurance companies, and some investment firms.

An audit may also be required if the company’s shareholders request one. Shareholders holding at least 10% of any class of shares, or 10% of voting rights, or 10% in number of members, can demand an audit. This request must be made in writing and received at least one month before the end of the financial year.

Charitable companies are subject to different rules and often face lower thresholds for mandatory audits. For example, a charity may require an audit once its gross income exceeds £1 million, depending on its circumstances.

If you are unsure whether your company needs an audit, or whether an audit could be beneficial for lenders, investors, or business planning, please get in touch and we will be happy to review your position.

When a small business applies for a bank loan, the bank is mainly trying to answer one question, “How likely is it that we will be repaid, on time and in full?” To reach that decision, they will review a mix of financial evidence, trading performance and the overall risk profile of the business.

A key factor is affordability. Banks will look at recent accounts, tax returns (where relevant) and up to date management figures to see whether profits and cash flow can comfortably cover the proposed repayments. They will often request bank statements to understand day to day cash movement, whether income is stable and whether the business regularly runs tight on cash or relies heavily on an overdraft.

They will also assess the quality of the borrower. This includes the business credit record, payment history and any missed payments or County Court Judgements. In many cases the personal credit history of the directors or business owners will be reviewed as well, particularly for smaller companies or newer businesses.

Security is another important area. For secured lending the bank will consider what assets are available, such as property, vehicles, equipment or investments and the likely value if sold. For unsecured borrowing, banks may request a personal guarantee, which gives them extra protection if the business cannot repay.

Banks will also look closely at what the loan is for. Funding that supports growth, improves productivity or helps smooth short term cash flow tends to be viewed more positively than borrowing that simply plugs ongoing losses. A clear plan, realistic forecasts and evidence of customer demand can strengthen an application.

Finally, the bank may assess the wider trading outlook, sector risk and how dependent the business is on a small number of clients or suppliers. The stronger and more consistent the business looks, the better the chances of approval.

The Insolvency Service data for England and Wales shows monthly company insolvencies remain high by historical standards, even though they move up and down month to month. For example, November 2025 recorded 1,866 registered company insolvencies, down on October 2025 and also below the same month a year earlier. The wider context matters, monthly totals through 2025 have generally been slightly higher than 2024, but lower than 2023, which saw a 30 year high in annual insolvencies.

New company formations: still strong, but down on the prior year

On the formations side, Companies House figures show incorporation volumes have softened. In the financial year ending 2025, there were 801,864 company incorporations, down 10% compared with the financial year ending 2024. At the same time, dissolutions rose, with 726,735 dissolutions in the financial year ending 2025, up 9.6% on the prior year.

Quarterly data shows how this can translate into net shrinkage in the register for periods of time. Between July and September 2025 there were 215,982 incorporations and 234,373 dissolutions, so dissolutions outpaced incorporations in that quarter.

A practical way to read this is that the “start-up engine” is still running, but not as hot as it was, while the “clean-up” of non-viable businesses has accelerated.

Why both trends can be true at the same time

ONS business demography data helps explain the apparent contradiction. On an enterprise basis (different from Companies House incorporations, but directionally helpful), business births edged up from 316,000 to 317,000 between 2023 and 2024, while business deaths fell from 310,000 to 280,000, producing the lowest death rate since 2016.

So, depending on which lens you use, you can see: (a) high company insolvency activity, (b) lower incorporations than the prior year and (c) relatively resilient enterprise births and improved enterprise death rates. Differences in definitions and timing matter, but the shared message is that the UK is in a reallocation phase: weaker balance sheets and marginal business models are being pushed out, while new ventures keep forming, often leaner, more specialised and sometimes set up to replace old entities.

Making mistakes in business is unavoidable. No matter how experienced or careful someone is, decisions are made with imperfect information, time pressure and changing conditions. What separates resilient businesses from those that struggle is not the absence of mistakes, but the ability to learn from them and adapt.

The first step is recognising mistakes early. Small issues often provide warning signs before they develop into serious problems. A missed deadline, a dissatisfied client, or a project that runs over budget all contain useful information. Ignoring these signals, or explaining them away, usually makes matters worse. Acknowledging what has gone wrong allows corrective action while the impact is still manageable.

Once a mistake is identified, reflection becomes essential. This involves stepping back from the immediate emotional response and focusing on the underlying causes. Was the decision based on incomplete data, unrealistic assumptions, or insufficient resources? In many cases, mistakes reveal weaknesses in systems rather than individual failings. Understanding this distinction helps avoid blame and encourages constructive analysis.

Mistakes often highlight flaws in processes. Repeated pricing errors may point to poor cost tracking or unrealistic margins. Ongoing issues with staff turnover might indicate unclear roles or weak communication rather than performance problems. Reviewing systems after a setback allows businesses to improve controls, refine workflows and reduce the likelihood of repetition.

Another key lesson is adaptability. Markets change, customer expectations evolve and strategies that once worked may no longer be effective. A failed product launch or marketing campaign can reveal valuable insights about customer behaviour that would not have been obvious beforehand. Businesses that treat these outcomes as feedback, rather than failure, are better placed to adjust and move forward.

Sharing lessons learned is also important. When mistakes are discussed openly, others can benefit from the experience without repeating it themselves. This helps create a culture of continuous improvement, where people feel able to raise concerns and suggest improvements.

Over time, learning from mistakes builds resilience and confidence. Each setback that is understood and addressed strengthens future decision making. In business, mistakes are not a sign of incompetence, they are evidence of action. The real risk lies not in making mistakes, but in failing to learn from them.

Acquiring new assets is often essential for small businesses looking to grow, improve efficiency or remain competitive. Whether the investment is in vehicles, machinery, IT systems or specialist equipment, choosing the right funding method can have a significant impact on cash flow, tax efficiency and overall financial resilience. Understanding the main options available allows business owners to make more informed decisions.

Using existing cash reserves is the most straightforward option. Paying outright avoids interest costs and keeps administration simple. However, it can leave the business exposed if working capital is reduced too far. For many businesses, preserving cash for day to day operations, tax liabilities and unexpected costs is just as important as the asset purchase itself.

Bank loans remain a common funding route. Term loans allow the cost of an asset to be spread over its useful life, helping to align repayments with the income the asset generates. While interest rates are higher than in previous years, loans can still be suitable where cash flows are predictable, and the business has sufficient headroom to meet repayments. It is important to consider any security requirements and the impact on future borrowing capacity.

Asset finance is widely used for equipment, vehicles and machinery. Hire purchase and finance lease arrangements allow businesses to acquire assets with limited upfront cost, spreading payments over an agreed period. In many cases, the asset itself provides the security, which can reduce the need for personal guarantees. Asset finance can also offer flexibility, particularly where technology changes quickly or assets need regular replacement.

Operating leases are another option, especially for assets that depreciate rapidly or become obsolete. Rather than owning the asset, the business pays for its use over a fixed term. This can reduce balance sheet exposure and help manage cash flow, although ownership does not pass to the business at the end of the agreement.

For owner managed companies, director loans or additional capital introduced by shareholders may be considered. While this can avoid external borrowing, it still requires careful planning around tax, repayment terms and the long term impact on personal finances.

Each funding option has different accounting and tax implications, including capital allowances, interest relief and balance sheet treatment. The right choice will depend on the type of asset, the strength of the business cash flow and the wider financial objectives.

A short discussion at the planning stage can often lead to a more efficient and sustainable outcome.

Cash flow remains one of the most pressing concerns for small businesses, even where trading appears stable. Many businesses are finding that rising costs, cautious lenders and slower customer payments are combining to create ongoing pressure on day to day finances. In our experience, cash flow issues rarely arise from a single event. They tend to build gradually, which is why early visibility and proactive management are so important.

Operating costs have increased across most sectors, and these increases now feel structural rather than temporary. Wages, energy, insurance and supplier costs remain significantly higher than they were only a few years ago. For businesses with limited pricing power or fixed contracts, margins can be squeezed quickly, leaving less room to absorb delays in customer payments or unexpected expenses.

Access to finance has also become more restrictive. Overdrafts and short term lending are more expensive, reviews are more frequent and approval processes can take longer. This makes it harder to rely on borrowing as a flexible buffer when cash inflows are uneven. As a result, businesses need a clearer understanding of their cash position and greater control over the timing of payments in and out.

Late payment continues to be a major contributor to cash flow stress. Even well run businesses can struggle if customers consistently pay late or extend terms without discussion. When receipts are delayed, pressure quickly passes through to VAT, PAYE and Corporation Tax liabilities. What begins as a timing issue can escalate into missed deadlines, penalties or the need for time to pay arrangements with HMRC.

Credit control is another area where small improvements can have a meaningful impact. Prompt invoicing, clear payment terms and consistent follow up should be standard practice. Strong credit control is not about damaging relationships. It is about setting clear expectations and protecting the financial health of the business.

If you are experiencing cash flow pressure, or if you simply want greater confidence in your numbers, we can help. Please contact us to review your cash flow position, explore practical options and put a plan in place before issues become more difficult to manage.

Many businesses regard their overheads as fixed, predictable, and largely outside their control. In reality, an overhead audit often uncovers costs that have risen quietly, services that are no longer used, and processes that have gone unchallenged for far too long. Carrying out a structured review of overheads can make a surprising difference to cash flow, operational efficiency, and long-term resilience.

The first step is gathering recurring costs in one place. Software subscriptions, insurance, utility bills, telecoms, outsourced services, and routine maintenance contracts tend to increase gradually, which means individual changes can slip by unnoticed. When everything is viewed together, patterns become easier to spot. It is common to find duplicated tools, unused licences, or outdated service packages still being paid for out of habit rather than need.

Contract renewals deserve close attention. Many suppliers rely on the fact that clients rarely challenge terms once a service becomes familiar. Automatic renewals can lock a business into pricing or packages that no longer represent value. Reviewing renewal dates and comparing alternatives ahead of time allows the business to renegotiate, downscale, or switch suppliers before costs escalate.

An overhead audit also helps ensure that spending aligns with current operations. If the business has expanded, streamlined, shifted to remote work, or adopted new technology, its overhead structure may no longer make sense. Processes that once required manual effort might now be automated. Support services that were essential during one phase of growth may be unnecessary now. Questioning each cost in the context of how the business operates today often reveals opportunities to both reduce spend and improve workflow.

Energy usage is another area where even small steps can create meaningful savings. Reviewing tariffs, checking meter accuracy, and adopting simple efficiency measures can help stabilise costs in a market where prices move unpredictably. An audit encourages the business to think proactively, rather than reacting only when bills rise sharply.

Beyond savings, the audit strengthens planning. Once overheads are clearly understood, financial forecasting becomes more accurate and decisions around pricing, investment, and staffing become more grounded. The business gains a clearer view of its baseline costs and can respond more confidently to changes in trading conditions.

A regular overhead audit is not about cutting costs for the sake of it. It is about ensuring the business is not held back by waste, habits, or outdated commitments. By reviewing overheads with purpose and structure, a business can improve efficiency, protect cash flow, and build a more stable foundation for growth.

Accountants often see the impact that excess stock has on a business long before the business owner realises what is happening. Over-stocking drains cash, fills storage space, increases waste, and restricts flexibility at key moments. Many business owners still treat high stock levels as a sign of strength, yet in practice it is one of the most common and avoidable pressures on working capital. By helping clients understand how to optimise their stock, accountants can add real value and improve day-to-day decision making.

A good starting point is a closer look at demand patterns. Businesses often order based on habit rather than evidence, and assumptions can easily take on a life of their own. When accountants analyse twelve to twenty-four months of sales data, they usually uncover clear patterns that are not reflected in current ordering behaviour. Seasonal products, slow movers, and steady sellers all behave differently, and understanding these rhythms allows stock levels to align more closely with what customers actually buy.

Accountants also encourage clients to question their reliance on supplier discounts. Bulk deals appear attractive but often hide significant costs. Extra stock ties up cash that could be better used elsewhere and increases storage and handling expenses. A simple comparison between the real carrying cost of excess stock and the financial benefit of a discount often shows that smaller, more regular orders provide better value in the long run. Price per unit is only one part of the equation.

Introducing minimum and maximum stock levels is another practical step. Minimum levels act as early warning points for reordering, and maximum levels help prevent shelves from filling with more than the business can sensibly sell. These controls do not need to be complicated. A straightforward spreadsheet or low-cost stock system can support regular monthly reviews. As conditions change, these levels can be adjusted so the business remains agile and avoids relying on outdated assumptions.

Lead times are another area where accountants frequently help clients identify unnecessary buffers. Many businesses carry more stock than they need because they believe suppliers will take longer to deliver than they actually do. Reviewing real lead times against assumed ones often reveals opportunities to reduce stock safely. When decisions are based on accurate data rather than instinct, clients gain confidence to hold less stock without risking service levels.

Stock ageing reports are equally valuable. They show which items have been sitting unsold for too long. Once slow movers are identified, clients can take action through promotions or clearance activity to release cash and create space for faster-moving lines. Even modest reductions can make a meaningful difference to cash flow.

Finally, accountants highlight the benefits of simple cloud-based stock tools. Even the most basic systems offer alerts, clearer visibility, and easier tracking, which supports more precise ordering without adding unnecessary complexity.

By providing this guidance, accountants help clients reduce waste, free up working capital, and run more responsive operations. Optimised stock levels lead to better decisions, improved resilience, and a healthier overall business.

Food and energy costs remain central concerns for households and businesses because they influence everything from wages to margins to day to day operating decisions. Inflation is easing compared to the volatility of the last few years, but the picture for the next twelve months is still mixed. Prices appear set to rise more slowly, yet neither category is likely to fall in any meaningful way.

Food price outlook

Food prices surged during the supply chain disruptions of 2021 to 2023 and were pushed higher again by wage pressures, transport costs and global shipping instability. Although the pace of increase has slowed during the past year, prices remain high. Many clients still question why food costs have not dropped as headline inflation falls. The reason is that the underlying conditions that drove those increases have not disappeared. Agriculture, food production, and distribution still face labour shortages, higher input costs, and ongoing uncertainty in global trade routes.

The most likely outcome for the coming year is a gradual easing in the rate of food inflation rather than a reduction in prices. Supermarkets report calmer supply chains and producers appear more willing to absorb cost pressures in order to protect sales volumes. Better harvests in some regions and lower freight costs should also help. These factors together should keep the next year more stable than the recent past.

Energy price outlook

Energy prices have been among the most unpredictable elements of the recent inflation cycle. While the extreme spikes have eased, the underlying global influences remain. The UK is particularly exposed because it relies heavily on imported gas and is tied to international pricing. Global gas markets continue to react to geopolitical tensions, shipping disruptions and variations in European storage levels. These variables explain why energy pricing still carries a degree of uncertainty.

However, the direction for next year looks a little steadier.

What this means for business planning

The next year is unlikely to bring substantial falls in food or energy prices, but the environment should feel less pressured. This increased stability provides an opportunity for better budgeting and more confident forecasting. Hospitality businesses and manufacturers may find it easier to plan pricing strategies, menus and supply arrangements. Broader stability also supports decisions on energy efficiency projects since assumptions about future savings appear more reliable.

Many business owners focus on sales as the main driver of growth. Sales matter, but they are only part of the story. Real financial growth happens when a business retains profits. Keeping a portion of earnings inside the business, rather than extracting everything each year, creates stability, resilience and long term value. It is one of the most reliable ways for a business to strengthen its financial position.

Retained profit is simply the surplus left after all costs, tax and drawings or dividends have been paid. When owners choose to leave some of this in the business, the financial base becomes stronger. Cash balances increase, working capital improves and the business has more freedom to act. This is important because many opportunities appear only when a business is ready to respond. A new contract, a piece of equipment, or an unexpected staff change often needs quick decisions. Financial strength gives owners room to choose rather than react.

Another advantage is the reduction of financial strain. When profits are taken out in full, the business can become fragile. Seasonal changes, delayed payments, or rising costs can suddenly create pressure. Retaining profits reduces this risk. It smooths the ups and downs of trading and reduces reliance on overdrafts or short term borrowing. Over time, this lowers costs because the business is not constantly paying interest or reshaping its finances to manage cash shortages.

Retained profits also support growth by funding future investment. Whether it is new technology, better equipment, improved systems, or additional staff, every investment needs capital. Using retained profits means the business can invest without taking on unnecessary debt. This keeps control in the hands of the owners and protects future cash flow. In many cases, even small retained amounts, built up steadily, can support meaningful improvements.

There is also a psychological effect. When owners see their business building reserves, confidence grows. Decisions become more strategic and less driven by short term pressures. This confidence often leads to better long term planning, more thoughtful hiring and a clearer focus on profitability rather than turnover alone.

Finally, strong retained profits increase the value of the business. Buyers look for organisations with reliable earnings, low debt and healthy reserves. A pattern of retaining profits signals discipline and financial strength, which can significantly improve valuation.

Retaining profits is not about restricting personal income. It is about giving the business the capacity to grow, adapt and remain competitive. When owners take a long term view, retaining profits becomes one of the simplest and most effective tools for building financial strength.